Case study / Publishing Technology
KU Journals
A scholarly publishing platform for institutional archives and peer-reviewed journals.
Public interface captured on 2026-07-14.
Project Record
Responsibility Boundary
- —Editorial policies remain the publisher’s responsibility.
- —Journal content and peer-review management are handled by institutional editors.
- —No measurable institutional outcome is claimed.
The need
What the project had to make possible.
Kenyatta University needed a coherent public home for institutional journals and their archives, supported by a publishing platform that could be maintained beyond launch.
The Airix response
The work carried by Airix.
- 01
Designed a visual interface and theme architecture for the university's journal collection.
- 02
Engineered and implemented the theme within OJS 3.3.
- 03
Continued technical upkeep and platform-stability work under the recorded relationship.
What the public record supports.
A public OJS interface through which readers can reach the institution's journals and archive. The record verifies the delivered platform and Airix responsibilities; it does not claim an institutional or publishing-performance outcome.
Verified Airix responsibilities
Design
Visual interface and theme architecture.
Development
Engineering and theme implementation.
Maintenance
Technical upkeep and platform stability.
Technical Evidence Register
Public interface visible footer credit
public record
Internal source capture archive
source capture · 2026-07-14
This record follows the Airix Evidence Standard. We publish only responsibilities and outcomes supported by public records or owner-confirmed data. Internal identifiers and non-public metrics are excluded.
Need a related system?
Explore the relevant service, or send Airix the context around the platform you need to build, improve or recover.